Influencer Intelligence for Good: How GivingTuesday Levelled up Their Influencer Detection
- Charity
Influencer marketing is typically discussed as a commercial discipline—optimised for reach, conversions, and brand recall. But during GivingTuesday 2025, a different model of influence emerged. The charity challenged long-held assumptions about scale, incentives, and what effective creator partnerships look like. This analysis uses influencer intelligence to examine how GivingTuesday 2025 reshaped influencer marketing for charities and brands, showing why follower count fails as a predictor of impact, and how belief-led participation drives trust, engagement, and cultural reach.
GivingTuesday is a global social media-led day of giving, marked each year on the Tuesday after Black Friday, when people and organisations use the hashtag #GivingTuesday to encourage donations, volunteering, and acts of generosity. They challenged creators to post about their generous acts. Across the dataset, creator size and performance varied dramatically. The largest creator involved had around 150,000 followers, while the smallest had fewer than 20. At the content level, likes ranged from single digits to over 7,000, and views from just 33 at the low end to roughly 284,000 at the top. Yet these extremes sit side by side in the same campaign moment, underscoring that GivingTuesday’s influence was not concentrated in a single tier of creators, but spread across a broad spectrum of participation.
@breezleweezle it may be small, but small acts still mean something 🫶🏻 #GivingTuesday #momlife #parenting #momsoftiktok #thanksgiving @GivingTuesday ♬ sonido original - dinoedits_superandom🦖
Rather than concentrating attention through a small number of high-profile creators, GivingTuesday enabled a broad network of participants to show up in their own voice, across platforms, and at vastly different audience sizes. The result was not a single spike of attention, but a distributed cultural moment, built through belief-led participation rather than targeted paid amplification.
By using Kale to engage creators around GivingTuesday, charities and advocates demonstrated that influence does not need to be centralized, or celebrity-led to be impactful. Kale is a creator rewards platform that pays everyday social media users to share content about products they already use and love. Instead of prioritising follower count, it uses challenges and performance-based rewards to help brands tap into authentic, fan-led content from real customers. Here, GivingTuesday achieved a more distributed, values-driven approach - where participation matters more than promotion.
But while Kale provided the infrastructure to connect creators to the moment, understanding why this model worked - and how brands can replicate it - requires a different layer of analysis. This is where influencer intelligence comes in.
To learn more about GivingTuesday’s online impact, check out our analysis of their 2024 international day of giving here.
Influence without scale: follower count is not the driver
At first glance, the GivingTuesday creator cohort appears highly fragmented. Creator follower counts range from fewer than 100 to well over 75,000. Views and likes fluctuate just as dramatically - from double-digit views to hundreds of thousands.
What at first glance looks like inconsistency is actually revealed to be decoupling.
Higher follower counts do not reliably translate into higher visibility or engagement. Some of the most-viewed and most-engaged posts came from mid-sized or smaller creators, while several high-follower accounts delivered comparatively modest performance.
From an influencer intelligence perspective, this matters because it confirms that in cause-led campaigns reach is a weak proxy for impact. Performance is driven by resonance rather than scale, and cultural alignment consistently outperforms audience size.
For brands, this shifts the optimization question entirely, from who has the biggest audience to who carries the most trust with the right audience.
Why follower count fails to predict influencer impact in cause-led campaigns
Notably, some of the highest-follower creators generated relatively modest engagement—tens rather than thousands of likes—while some mid-tier or smaller creators produced posts that attracted thousands of interactions or hundreds of thousands of views. This disconnect between follower count and performance reinforces the idea that reach alone is not a reliable predictor of impact in cause-led campaigns. For example, the following Instagram post gained over 26,000 views from an account with just 400 followers.
View this post on Instagram
Several creators posted multiple times across the campaign window, suggesting sustained engagement rather than a one-off transactional activation. The most consistent signal across the dataset is not peak performance, but repeat participation. These creators were not simply fulfilling a brief; they were repeatedly positioning GivingTuesday as something they actively take part in.
The data therefore reflects brand advocacy through continued presence and narrative consistency, rather than visibility alone.
Engagement efficiency as a signal of trust
When creators are ranked by engagement rate (likes relative to views), a different hierarchy emerges.
The top-performing creators are not celebrities or macro-influencers. They are nano- and micro-creators whose audiences behave less like spectators and more like peers. One creator with just 2,500 followers achieved an engagement rate of approximately 35%. Others sustained rates above 20% - nearly ten times typical industry benchmarks for accounts of their size.
When looking at this from an influencer intelligence standpoint, engagement rate here functions as a proxy for trust. High efficiency indicates audience attentiveness rather than passive scrolling. Likes signal endorsement rather than simple exposure. Viewers are responding to belief, not production value.
These creators are not perceived as performers delivering content. They are perceived as people taking part. That distinction is critical for charitable influence. In this dynamic, trust, credibility, and shared values do the persuasive work that reach alone cannot. Influence becomes less about how many people see a message, and more about how convincingly that message fits within an ongoing relationship between creator and audience.
View this post on Instagram
In practical terms, this reframes influence as a function of belief-led participation rather than scale-led amplification. For charities, the implication is significant: effectiveness comes from enabling the right voices to speak authentically, not from maximising exposure through the biggest platforms or personalities.
For brands, influence is strongest when belief replaces reach
The data from GivingTuesday 2025 supports a clear and increasingly important hypothesis: charity influencer partnerships are most effective when creators participate as genuine believers in the cause, rather than acting as external amplifiers of a campaign message.
What drives impact here is not the mechanical distribution of content, but the credibility of the person sharing it—and the extent to which their advocacy feels earned, personal, and consistent with how they already show up online. In practice, this meant that creators with vastly different audience sizes were able to contribute meaningfully to the same cultural moment.
View this post on Instagram
This challenges the dominant logic of influencer marketing, which has historically prioritised audience size, visibility, and reach as proxies for effectiveness. In commercial contexts, scale can still matter. But in charitable contexts, influence operates according to a different set of rules. Audiences are far more attuned to questions of intent, sincerity, and alignment. When a creator’s involvement appears transactional or loosely connected to their existing values, trust erodes quickly—regardless of how large their following may be.
By contrast, creators who are culturally proximate to the cause e.g. those whose identities, communities, or histories give them a credible reason to care, carry disproportionate persuasive power. A creator with fewer than 2,000 followers, generating only a handful of likes, is not necessarily failing in this model; they are signalling belief to a highly specific and trusted audience. At the other end of the spectrum, creators with tens of thousands of followers posted content that remained low-production and personal, resisting the polish typically associated with high-reach partnerships.
Platform dynamics: participation vs. amplification
TikTok emerges as the primary engine of participation, supporting conversational, low-production, personal framing. Instagram plays a secondary role, delivering intermittent amplification rather than sustained engagement. Together they form a complementary system, with density on TikTok and reinforcement on Instagram.
For brands, this underlines the importance of platform-native influencer analysis. A one-size-fits-all creator strategy misses how influence actually travels. Pulsar’s cross-platform influencer intelligence allows teams to compare creator performance by platform context, identify where participation clusters versus where amplification occurs, and understand how narratives move between spaces.
Influence rooted in identity, not philanthropy
One of the most revealing signals in the dataset comes from hashtag analysis using Pulsar TRAC. The dominant hashtags used by leading creators are not philanthropic. They are lifestyle- and identity-based, centered on parenting, daily routines, and community roles. This suggests that GivingTuesday succeeded by embedding itself inside existing trust networks rather than asking creators to adopt a new, cause-specific identity.
From an influencer intelligence perspective, this is decisive. The most effective advocates were not charity influencers. They were people whose audiences already trusted them in everyday contexts. This reinforces a core strategic lesson: influence is carried through identity alignment rather than campaign messaging.
The GivingTuesday data suggests that influence in this context accumulates horizontally rather than vertically. Instead of relying on a single authoritative voice, cultural visibility is built through many credible participants showing up together—whether they are reaching dozens, hundreds, or hundreds of thousands of people. This collective presence reduces reputational risk while increasing perceived authenticity.
From influencer marketing to influencer participation
GivingTuesday 2025 reveals a shift now reshaping brand influencer marketing: the move from influencer promotion to influencer participation.
Creators were embedded as participants in a cultural moment rather than positioned as external broadcasters executing a brief. This changes how audiences interpret content. Participation signals belief, belief builds trust, and trust lowers friction. Audiences increasingly respond to creators who appear motivated by conviction rather than contract.
For brands, this reframes influencer partnerships from short-term media buys into long-term credibility assets that shape brand meaning inside communities.
Why influencer intelligence is now essential for brand strategy
The GivingTuesday model points to a more resilient approach to influencer marketing. High-performing partnerships hinge less on audience size and more on values alignment and narrative credibility. Creators perform best when communicating in their own voice using native formats that match how they normally engage their audience.
Success is no longer defined by isolated viral spikes, but by the breadth and consistency of participation across trusted creator networks. Lo-fi, native content should be treated as a signal of authenticity rather than a compromise on quality. This represents a structural shift from buying reach to cultivating trusted participation at scale. Executing this model consistently requires more from marketing teams than just creator activation. It requires full-scale commitment from teams to influencer intelligence.
Influencer intelligence enables brands to identify belief-aligned creators before outreach begins, evaluate trust signals beyond follower counts, understand how influence accumulates across communities over time, and reduce reputational risk by prioritizing credibility over visibility.
As audiences grow more skeptical of paid endorsements, participation itself becomes a signal of credibility. GivingTuesday points toward a future where brand influence is built through networks of trusted advocates rather than concentrated in a small number of high-reach partnerships.
We’ve moved past the days of simply renting attention. Now, using influencer detection and intelligence, brands can embed themselves across many smaller, trusted communities through belief-led participation. In this context, influence is no longer primarily about amplification. It becomes infrastructure: cumulative, distributed, and built on trust over time.
To stay up to date with our latest insights and releases, sign up to our newsletter below:
This article was created using data from TRAC
